Re^5: Good Intentions: Wikisyntax for the Monastery

..mmmh no the syntax must be described in one place, it is possible to add to the original post.

But more important will be to change the wiki? text of the checkbox into a link to this post. Infact I asked to powers to add your wiki to the markup in the monastery docs but seems not so wide valid; a quick link always available to all wikisyntax users will be handy.

There are no rules, there are no thumbs..
Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.

Comment on Re^5: Good Intentions: Wikisyntax for the Monastery Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Good Intentions: Wikisyntax for the Monastery by LanX (Saint) on Oct 14, 2016 at 19:08 UTC
Look I'm on holidays ATM so don't expect much activity now. There are currently only 4 monks using this extension, so I don't see the external need for more development, I.e. I'll plan it to fit my needs. Concerning the admins, this site is already very complicated, that's why they understandably avoid including more code. As I said before there is one killer feature, automatically introducing `<p>` tags for blank lines but this could be achieved otherwise. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: Good Intentions: Wikisyntax for the Monastery
by LanX (Saint) on Oct 14, 2016 at 19:08 UTC

There are currently only 4 monks using this extension, so I don't see the external need for more development, I.e. I'll plan it to fit my needs.

Concerning the admins, this site is already very complicated, that's why they understandably avoid including more code.

As I said before there is one killer feature, automatically introducing <p> tags for blank lines but this could be achieved otherwise.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}

[reply]
[d/l]