in reply to Re: Re: Re: indirect object in camel book
in thread indirect object in camel book
However, how do you explain to someone that every single method call you make uses the '->' syntax ... except for the constructor, which doesn't, but instead starts using this (seemingly) random '::' syntax. This isn't the most maintainable concept. What happens if you forget to put the second ':'? The difference between ':' and ';' isn't entirely obvious to a casual glance. In addition, as ':' and ';' are on the same key, mistyping problems are multiplied.
Essentially, what this boils down to is "Wow, that's a neat way of doing things. I didn't know I could do that. But, why on earth would I want to obfuscate my production code?"
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: indirect object in camel book
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Oct 08, 2001 at 20:23 UTC |