in reply to Re^2: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 (just 'perl6')
in thread Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6

There are already many brackets in use ... anyway I think adding the tag to the title is just a weak workaround.

IMHO the real thing would be a better integration of the keyword nodelet.

That is, at least providing an input box while editing a post and making them searchable.

Showing the keywords alongside in RAT and Newest Nodes would be a plus.

Update

OTOH keywords are not inherited from the root node to replies...

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!

  • Comment on Re^3: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 (just 'perl6')

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 (just 'perl6')
by jdporter (Paladin) on Nov 29, 2016 at 17:52 UTC

    We (all monks) really just need to think of the "title" field as "where you put the keywords" (or really, key phrases).

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

      Perhaps the simplest mechanism would be to turn the problem on its head to provide a semi automated solution.

      That is, since most of the animosity is towards non-perl5 posts; have a pre-checked checkbox next to the title field on the create screen labeled [x]Perl5; and ask people to un-check it if their post is not strictly Perl5, and add perl5 to all new posts where it is left checked.

      Then the "nothing but Perl(5)" guys have a clear indication of which posts are suitable for them and the rest of us can make our choices on what sounds interesting to us.


      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.