in reply to Re: pp and setting Windows LegalCopyright in executable header
in thread pp and setting Windows LegalCopyright in executable header
Your post has been considered: "invitation to piracy? If so, vote reap." (see "Nodes to consider").
I didn't think piracy was your intent and voted "edit"; however, having done so, I found I was alone in this and all other votes were "reap".
To avoid having your post removed altogether, I'd recommend you edit the "pack it up" part in such a way that it doesn't suggest packing up the PDK but rather the OP's executable. I believed that was your intent and this was reinforced by the fact that you were offering to do the work yourself: "i can ... add these infos for you.".
The reason I voted "edit", instead of "keep", was mainly because you'd included your email address. Please remove it and replace with "/msg" or similar. Whatever information (email addresses, phone numbers, etc.) that you choose to share in a private message is your business. See "How (Not) To Ask A Question: Don't Give Us Your Email Address" for further details about this.
By the way, I upvoted your post. I thought it was a nice offer (albeit, perhaps, badly worded).
— Ken
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: pp and setting Windows LegalCopyright in executable header [node considered]
by james28909 (Deacon) on Dec 12, 2016 at 23:05 UTC | |
|
Re^3: pp and setting Windows LegalCopyright in executable header (node considered, keep)
by beech (Parson) on Dec 07, 2016 at 23:53 UTC |