Re: SSCCE down?

Hi all,

An update: Although sscce.org is back up now, as jdporter noted, I received a reply from Andrew Thompson that it's okay to mirror the document here, which I have now done at SSCCE - the node title should make it easy to remember when linking, as [SSCCE].

As for what else could be done with the node - such as perhaps moving it to a more appropriate section (?) or perhaps adding some more PerlMonks specific annotations, I'm open to suggestions.

Regards,
-- Hauke D

Comment on Re: SSCCE down?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: SSCCE down? by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 13, 2016 at 22:58 UTC
Okie dokie. As is my wont, I fs ck ed around with things to make them "better". Namely: The meditation haukex posted is now a tutorial. (It still needs a pedo to file it appropriately, however.) The post now has a full, proper title. The abbreviation, "SSCCE", is now the title of a "faqstring" node. (These are essentially kind of like alias nodes, useful for things like common acronyms.) Check it: SSCCE I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]
Re^2: SSCCE down? by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 12, 2016 at 20:55 UTC
Excellent. Thank you! And I hope/trust you thanked Mr. Thompson on behalf of our community. ... such as perhaps moving it to a more appropriate section ... Yes, I think your intuition is good; it should probably be moved to the Tutorials section. I have placed a consideration on it for just that purpose. Thanks again! I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]
Re^2: SSCCE down? by 1nickt (Canon) on Dec 12, 2016 at 12:58 UTC
Great work Hauke! I think SSCCE would be improved greatly by the addition of a two-level linked section menu as in POD, and possibly the addition of a synopsis at the top. Maybe your excellent footnotes should be at the bottom and linked in the menu. Thanks again. The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply]