Re^5: Tricky chemicals optimization problem

Hi Anonymous,

I actually had to do a diff of your two replies to figure out if there are differences, and it appears that there are, but only in the last paragraph in a few words. I'll consider the other node for reaping, but I'd strongly recommend you register an account so that you can edit nodes. (Update: That would have been useful in the case of this node as well.)

Regards,
-- Hauke D

Comment on Re^5: Tricky chemicals optimization problem

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Tricky chemicals optimization problem by LanX (Saint) on Jan 10, 2017 at 15:24 UTC
Hi Hauke Unfortunately I've already considered the newer duplicate, while you considered the older original, which already got a reply in the meantime. And I think I've checked if there are any consideration conflicts before doing so. So hopefully people will now do the right thing. .. :) Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^7: Tricky chemicals optimization problem by haukex (Archbishop) on Jan 10, 2017 at 15:36 UTC
Hi Rolf, Yes, I saw, and I think our considerations happened right around the same time. So hopefully people will now do the right thing. .. :) Yep, I hope so :-) (Or perhaps one of the janitors might spot these nodes and remove the consideration.) Regards, -- Hauke D	[reply]