in reply to [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?
Hi BrowserUk,
I'm a lackluster mathematics student, but perhaps I can volunteer an explanation that doesn't stray too far from the rigor.
First, I think I would like to recast your statement as "For any set of n elements the number of ways to partition the set into k non-empty subsets is denoted S(n,k) and these numbers are known as Stirling numbers of the second kind."
Sometimes the rule S(n,k) = 0 if k>n is given for completeness, i.e., you can't partition something up into more non-empty subsets than for which it has elements, but this is considered obvious and you won't run into the need for it if you start with any reasonable case where n>=k.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Can this be explained in layman's terms?
by huck (Prior) on Jan 14, 2017 at 08:19 UTC | |
by NetWallah (Canon) on Jan 14, 2017 at 18:54 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 20, 2017 at 15:15 UTC |