in reply to Re^5: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?
in thread [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

He just didn't expend the effort in this case. It's not that he couldn't make a much better title; he just seemed to have forgotten the importance of doing so.

Exactly wrong in every case:

  1. I chose the title very carefully.
  2. I used the one I did because I couldn't think of a better one.
  3. I have not forgotten the importance of a good title; but that does not apply to this question.

    It's a question no one else will ever seek the answer to.

You just didn't understand the question and for some reason that has put your nose out of joint.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
  • Comment on Re^6: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom