Re^2: Camelizing a maitre d'Hotel

Yes, sure, apostrophe wouldn't be appropriate here.

But how to call it? ~~Maitre::DHotel, Maitre::Dhotel, MaitreD::Hotel, Maitred::Hotel, Maitre::D::Hotel~~ (uh, actually it was kind of sarcasm, I don't need to separate this namespace by 2 parts)

V.Melnik

Comment on Re^2: Camelizing a maitre d'Hotel Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Camelizing a maitre d'Hotel by LanX (Saint) on Feb 03, 2017 at 15:36 UTC
> `Maitre::DHotel, Maitre::Dhotel, MaitreD::Hotel, Maitred::Hotel, Maitre::D::Hotel` , oh damn it... :) There is no Maitre namespace on CPAN yet. Unless you plan to release `Maitre::Maison` or `Maitre::Bordel` later, I'd stick with MaitreDHotel. see also PadWalker ===Update But if you insist on creating a new namespace drop the D since the :: could be seen as preposition. `Maitre::Hotel` Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!} UPDATE: typo corected! thanks GotToBTru++	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Camelizing a maitre d'Hotel by v_melnik (Scribe) on Feb 03, 2017 at 17:05 UTC
Oh, thanks, it seems that I forgot to add the `MaitredHotel` and `MaitreDHotel` options to this list :) Of course, I don't need it to be looking like a class and a subclass, so there shouldn't be `::` at all. So, generally I'm choosing between `MaitreDHotel` and `MaitredHotel`, and `MaitreDeHotel`. :) V.Melnik	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Camelizing a maitre d'Hotel by Anonymous Monk on Feb 03, 2017 at 20:04 UTC
Shouldn't it be `Hotel::Maitre`?	[reply]