in reply to Re^8: is there a way to ensure some code is the last thing that is run? (SUPEREND)
in thread is there a way to ensure some code is the last thing that is run?
But I suppose the code in SUPEREND could dynamically create a new class with a destructor.
At that time you've already done your introspection, so this destructor would not have been covered I suppose...
And no, I don't really need it, I would only be interested if it was possible at all in the most general case...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^10: is there a way to ensure some code is the last thing that is run? (SUPEREND)
by LanX (Saint) on Feb 03, 2017 at 16:09 UTC |
