Re^4: Can't find a module that is installed

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Can't find a module that is installed by poj (Abbot) on Feb 17, 2017 at 16:55 UTC
`Argument "2.53_01" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at forks.pm line 1570.` Not sure how relevant it is to your problem but that message is described in this bug report This is more of an issue now that the latest stable perl version is using a version of Storable which triggers this warning. From 5.22.01 perldelta: Storable has been upgraded from version 2.53 to 2.53_01. poj	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Can't find a module that is installed by Weebo (Novice) on Feb 17, 2017 at 18:36 UTC
It appears to be very relevant. I followed the instructions in that thread for how to fix `forks.pm` and not the problem has moved to Can't locate forks/signals.pm in @INC (you may need to install the for +ks::signals module) (@INC contains: /Data/Apps/maker/bin/../perl/lib +/Data/Apps/maker/bin/../lib /Data/Apps/maker/bin/../src/inc/perl/lib +/Data/Apps/CEGMA_v2.5/lib /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/p +erl/5.22.1 /usr/local/share/perl/5.22.1 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/per +l5/5.22 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.22 /usr/sha +re/perl/5.22 /usr/local/lib/site_perl /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl- +base .) at forks.pm line 83. [download] So, unless I'm misunderstanding something, the `forks` module needs to be updated to account for the `X.Y_Z` version numbers or I need to roll `Storable` back to a `X.Y` version?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Can't find a module that is installed by Anonymous Monk on Feb 17, 2017 at 22:25 UTC
cp ... Hi, As a general rule copying files around is not the way to solve directories missing from @INC	[reply]