in reply to Re^3: WWW-Mechanize-Firefox install issue
in thread WWW-Mechanize-Firefox install issue

> uninformed criticism

I've spent days fixing our users' setup after they force-installed a library, they often didn't know what they were doing, so they installed newer versions of libraries into their system Perl and broke everything. Finding the reason why the test failed is often much cheaper than that, but YMMV.

($q=q:Sq=~/;[c](.)(.)/;chr(-||-|5+lengthSq)`"S|oS2"`map{chr |+ord }map{substrSq`S_+|`|}3E|-|`7**2-3:)=~y+S|`+$1,++print+eval$q,q,a,

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: WWW-Mechanize-Firefox install issue
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 24, 2017 at 09:15 UTC

    > uninformed criticism

    I've spent days fixing our users' setup after they force-installed a library, they often didn't know what they were doing, so they installed newer versions of libraries into their system Perl and broke everything. Finding the reason why the test failed is often much cheaper than that, but YMMV.

    ++:)++ thats some nice truth from the trenches (truism?) ... not relevant to IPC-Run-0.94/t/run.t

    See Ignoring test failures is stupid, most minor test failures are failures of the test suite not of the module