Re^2: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives

All Perl webframeworks RFC:SHOULD use PSGI as their interface layer. CGI can be used through PSGI.

Except that as discussed a few weeks back it is very slow with PSGI in a non-persistent environment. Too slow for me to be useful but YMMV.

Comment on Re^2: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Feb 27, 2017 at 13:32 UTC
Yes. Sorry, I should have mentioned. But all webframeworks are slow without a persistent layer and CGI is probably going to be among the fastest. And in any large application, all of them will be too slow for practical use and some, like a big Catalyst app, completely unusable.	[reply]
Re^3: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives by Anonymous Monk on Feb 28, 2017 at 00:47 UTC
Except that as discussed a few weeks back it is very slow with PSGI in a non-persistent environment. Too slow for me to be useful but YMMV. You're saying CGI program running under PSGI is SLOER than same program running under CGI? Sounds like a broken program, see CGI to mod_perl Porting. mod_perl Coding guidelines	[reply]