in reply to Re^5: foreach type of deal?
in thread foreach type of deal?
Wow, I'm thinking I have a lot to learn. I was with you until the in, out deal. I never even considered that I had to use something like that. You're right, I shouldn't have been thinking about making a change to the original copy.
I tried the code, and it works, but it will only work if I comment out use strict mode. Otherwise, I'm getting errors on declarations. I'm currently trying to figure out how to declare this code correctly. As I said, the code works like a charm, but I want to see if I can at least get the declarations correct. :/.
I learned a few things with this, but I wouldn't have come close to figuring this out without you guys. Thanks!
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: foreach type of deal?
by huck (Prior) on Mar 15, 2017 at 21:50 UTC | |
by hoagies (Initiate) on Mar 15, 2017 at 22:26 UTC |