in reply to Re^2: html parsing
in thread html parsing
I'd downvote my answer, if I could, not only for the shameless plug.
Also your assignment is very low value because it explicitly uses $1 when you could have instead captured the value directly (and safer too).
Providing code for that end might significantly improve this subthread.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: html parsing
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 22, 2017 at 15:51 UTC |