Re^2: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository

in reply to Re: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository
in thread Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository

Why are you sorry?

If that's the venue, then great :)

I was hoping for something perhaps outside of that as CUFP isn't normally associated with the usage of Perlmonks itself.

Comment on Re^2: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository by RonW (Parson) on Mar 22, 2017 at 23:35 UTC
I would say that the LCD program fits in CUFP because it is Perl. CSS, Javascript, etc., that interacts with PM, sort of fits in CUFP, but, Personally, I'd like to see it in a different section for ease of finding it. The only section I know of that is dedicated to the PM website is PerlMonks Discussion, but CSS, etc. doesn't really belong there, either. I think a "PerlMonks Hacks" section would be reasonable to add.	[reply]
Re^4: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository by stevieb (Canon) on Mar 22, 2017 at 23:37 UTC
Scratch the example I provided. It was, after all, an example scenario.	[reply]
Re^5: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository by RonW (Parson) on Mar 22, 2017 at 23:39 UTC
Is still a cool use of Perl, so CUFP is a good place for that.	[reply]
Re^3: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository by Anonymous Monk on Mar 23, 2017 at 00:22 UTC
I'm sorry because new sections will not happen, I think there should be a new Section on PerlMonks for Jobs/Modules/Quizzes/Perl6/Newbies/OffTopic/etc. is older than Snippets Section and Code Catacombs deprecated for new posting	[reply]
Re^4: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository by stevieb (Canon) on Mar 23, 2017 at 02:27 UTC
May I ask why you are being Anonymonk? Your statement seems legit.	[reply]
Re^5: Adding a "client-side manipulation" repository by Anonymous Monk on Mar 23, 2017 at 16:58 UTC
Because we can. May we ask why you assume so much?	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion