in reply to recurse directories and sub-directories

Please do not vote to delete this node without first comparing it carefully with the one which it is erroneously (as the monk who originally proposed it for deletion agrees) supposed to duplicate. They're a pair of links to tie two related threads into one for the benefit of future generations. But they're not duplicates.

I confess I don't really understand these topics, but I'm reliably informed in the CB that this thread is related to the present one, as well as being a more detailed statement of the question, and may be worth a look.

§ George Sherston
  • Comment on Re: recurse directories and sub-directories