in reply to Re: [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?
in thread [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?

I admit spending too little time on the post, while waiting to go into a class and on a rather fickle wifi connection, so I guess I kind of deserve your reply. That said: 1) I did consider Meditations, but picked Seekers of Perl Wisdom instead; 2) I assume at least some of the monks here are fans of regular expressions and have read about the absent operator, so I need not present much introductory materials.

I have no strong opinion yet on the feature, perhaps will only do so after finding some practical use-case for it and seeing its performance characteristics.

  • Comment on Re^2: [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?
by LanX (Saint) on Mar 25, 2017 at 13:06 UTC
    Sorry but the sources I found are frustratingly obscure, and installing the latest ruby to understand a badly documented experimental feature is not an option.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!