in reply to Re^5: Alternative to CGI.pm
in thread Alternative to CGI.pm

That's interesting to know, but in the scheme of things, it's not worth changing that. The Mojo pages we have work as long as we don't have to change something on them, then the wailing and gnashing of teeth starts. ;-) If we're going to change the templates, we might as well rip out Mojo all together and just go with 1 tech: CGI with TT. Or at least I think that's far easier to justify as far as time spent versus what we get for the effort. IMO of course. :)

At least this language is more clear that the limitations aren't with Mojo

The problem is choice

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Alternative to CGI.pm
by kbrannen (Beadle) on Mar 27, 2017 at 14:31 UTC
    For me, the problem is lack of understanding of what the new platforms really give me for the time I'd invest to learn, despite visiting the various sites that promote the tech. They make all kinds of claims, but I can't see significant benefits when I look at the tutorials. So I'd say it's a communication problem, probably 90% on my side, :) but still the message isn't coming across in a way that makes me think, "hey, that'd be really useful".
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom