Re^3: Directory Structure.

if you're passing user input to the shell

if youre passing data from untrusted sources unlaundered into the shell (see perlsec) is both more general and to the point. If I'm the user - whom I mostly trust - there's nothing wrong with my data. Except if there is, of course.

</nitpick>

perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'

Comment on Re^3: Directory Structure.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Directory Structure. by AppleFritter (Vicar) on Apr 01, 2017 at 10:22 UTC
If I'm the user - whom I mostly trust - there's nothing wrong with my data. DO you trust yourself? I trust myself to not try and actively exploit or sabotage my own systems. I do not trust myself to always get things right -- coding defensively and making things fail gracefully, avoiding unexpected and potentially dangerous behavior, is a good thing! Avoiding the shell (unless you have a good reason not to) is like `use`ing `strict`. Yes, I trust myself, but I know I'm not perfect, so I'd rather have that extra safety net. (There's also the question of whether whoever is at the terminal, logged in as you, is ACTUALLY you, but in my case that's a lesser concern.)	[reply]
Re^5: Directory Structure. by shmem (Chancellor) on Apr 01, 2017 at 10:43 UTC
DO you trust yourself? Again, mostly. If I didn't, I couldn't be doing my job. Come on, if I don't trust myself, whome else could I trust? I do not trust myself to always get things right That's why I wrote Except if there is, of course. But that's not the point of my previous posting. It is not only user input, but unlaundered data from any source which cannot be trusted. perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'	[reply]