Re: Grouping of 2D arrays

Guessing your question is about the best strategy

You need to

I just noticed you have also a count to accumulate so something like

$product{PC}{Spare} = { count=>2, sum => 37,2}

Is a good structure.

So with which part do you have a problem?

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}

Comment on Re: Grouping of 2D arrays Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Grouping of 2D arrays by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Apr 20, 2017 at 15:06 UTC
`$product{PC}{Spare} = { count=>2, sum => 37,2}` Doesn't this give an "`Odd number of elements...`" warning? Maybe something like `$product{PC}{Spare} = { count=>2, sum => [37, 2] };` Give a man a fish: `<%-{-{-{-<`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Grouping of 2D arrays by LanX (Saint) on Apr 20, 2017 at 15:17 UTC
Probably, (for cultural reasons I don't wonder about a comma as fraction separator). But as shmem already said, converting to cents is the way to go to avoid rounding errors. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^4: Grouping of 2D arrays by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Apr 20, 2017 at 15:24 UTC
... cents ... Oh, `37,2` uses the perverse European decimal point! The penny drops... Give a man a fish: `<%-{-{-{-<`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Grouping of 2D arrays by LanX (Saint) on Apr 20, 2017 at 15:35 UTC
Re^6: Grouping of 2D arrays by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Apr 20, 2017 at 15:58 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here