Re: "executable suffixes" for -x on win32 (perlport)

I disagree with them on the same grounds that I disagree with Proc::Background)

You're right, but it's par for the course. None of the user and group info functions, nor most of the network info functions work either.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit

Comment on Re: "executable suffixes" for -x on win32 (perlport)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: "executable suffixes" for -x on win32 (perlport) by pryrt (Abbot) on Apr 27, 2017 at 18:08 UTC
as I found in Re^2: "executable suffixes" for -x on win32 (perlport), at least some of that appears to be a result of the MSVCRT implementation of `_stat()`.	[reply] [d/l]