in reply to Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available
Survey was okay. Results seem overall positive. I was a bit irritated that “vim” and “Atom” were on the multiple choice for IDEs while things like “Emacs” and “TextMate” (and as hippo mentioned, “Padre”) were not. Indicative of the tone of the survey to me. A little overly guided with some questions open to subjective interpretation. Still, nicely presented results and always good to do publicity oriented / conversation starter stuff for Perl.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available
by LanX (Saint) on Apr 27, 2017 at 14:47 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Apr 27, 2017 at 16:39 UTC | |
Re^2: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available
by shmem (Chancellor) on Apr 27, 2017 at 15:02 UTC | |
Re^2: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available
by LanX (Saint) on Apr 27, 2017 at 11:36 UTC | |
by shmem (Chancellor) on Apr 27, 2017 at 11:57 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 27, 2017 at 17:06 UTC |