in reply to Discrepancy in reap notification message

I just received this /msg when voting reap on Reaped: Re: Inline::C producing an absurd result; which is a little confusing? 

You said "Reaped node at: <a href="?node_id=1189806">Reaped: Re: Inlin
+e::C producing an absurd result</a> because &#91;<a href="?node=hippo
+">hippo</a>&#93;: Reap: signal-free" to root

[download]
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit
a href=

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Discrepancy in reap notification message
by jdporter (Paladin) on May 08, 2017 at 19:18 UTC

    Yes, that is a little confusing, but that really is what you "said"* to root. The message appears in root's inbox like this:

    BrowserUk says Reaped node at: Reaped: Re: Inline::C producing an absurd result because [hippo]: Reap: signal-free

    But you're right, I'm not sure we like that better than how used to look before my last patch, as in this.

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
[reply]
      but that really is what you "said"* to root.

      Fair enough. Once you know what to expect, it's not a problem (for me).

      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion