in reply to [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?

While I am generally nervous about adding to the venerable regular-expression syntax, why not wait and see if this feature gains traction in Ruby-land?   If people actually find it useful, they will vote with their fingers as they write new source code that uses it.   If that actually happens, it can be added to Perl 5/6 easily enough.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?
by Anonymous Monk on May 17, 2017 at 17:18 UTC
    "venerable regular-expression syntax" and "vote with their fingers" ... you are trying very hard to sound clever.