in reply to Anonymous Monk comment(s) on questions

Hello thanos1983,

to costrain it is no good; freedom to express himself anonymously is a sign of civility in PM.

Also many anonymous comments are precious and technically neat and many monks post anonymously for years before creating an account.

I'd prefere a way to distinguish visually bad content from good one as proposed in Re: Let's Make PerlMonks Great Again! -- font size

L*

There are no rules, there are no thumbs..
Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Anonymous Monk comment(s) on questions
by thanos1983 (Parson) on May 25, 2017 at 09:36 UTC

    Hello Discipulus,

    I agree with you, I have noticed that many monks post an answer anonymously and also this is an open forum and people should express their opinion even if some people just spend time to comment in an insulting way the OP.

    On top of that, I was thinking that by restraining the Anonymous Monk on commenting on questions, how he/she would comment on his own question. I mean let's assume that Anonymous Monk is asking a question and there are some replies but yet he/she is not clear about the answer, how he/she would be able to comment after?

    So I think my idea is not applicable for many reasons. A better approach would be as you suggested to use key words to detect malware comments.

    Seeking for Perl wisdom...on the process of learning...not there...yet!
[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion