in reply to Re: Code plagiarism and clueless newbs -- unrelated
in thread Code plagiarism and clueless newbs

Hi Discipulus, I made a mistake in the title of my OP -- should not have used "clueless newbs" because it includes all kinds of ... well, clueless newbs, and you are right that in many cases there is no reason not to show code that directly provides what the seeker wants. I should have instead said in the title something about the homework element the post was really about, and/or the lack of work put in. Thanks.


The way forward always starts with a minimal test.
  • Comment on Re^2: Code plagiarism and clueless newbs -- unrelated