in reply to Re^2: REFLECTIONS on $_
in thread REFLECTIONS on $_

Oh the irony. What is implicit sense?
It seems I've lost my ability to post on the site? implicit sense? or explicit behaviour?
I guess you could file it under Existential Code Poem.
But I would rather, put it under 'Wait and see'.
Everyone needs logic. Which is to say I'm not here to bust chops, but what have i done but express my opinion.
I like the ternary logic in the boustrophodon example, but that's an entirely different subject. That's what you said, what i am saying will never be the same. I sense something rotten cos I can't post. Are you a moderator? Do you know why I can't post?
And what I wanted to post was cool. Does everyone have a 100% hit rate? Is that the problem?
Now it might be something wrong with the perlmonks server, the reason I can't post. I don't know.
Having fun if you are,
Jambo

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: REFLECTIONS on $_ -- obfupoetry
by Discipulus (Canon) on Jul 08, 2017 at 22:04 UTC
    Oh no, no moderator here and you can freely post about Perl as me and all!

    just..

    perl -e "print join' ',map{(scalar reverse $ARGV[$_])./^(0|6|11|17|24| +27|30)$/?'ose,':'')}reverse 0..$#ARGV" psnart a od ot uoy rof pmi ton seod siht tub lc os ton s'ti em rof n e +ht no si uoy rof fi pmoc uoy sa rp ruoy tub ppus I ,uoy sa ,tiforp dn +a nuf rof ereh m'I

    L*

    There are no rules, there are no thumbs..
    Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.

      Actually I can't seem to post so that's that.

      If you mean to say you don't see the point, then there is no point, then there is no point.
      It's discourse, transposed or not.

      #!/usr/bin/perl use warnings; use strict; use v5.20; (say(undef)) ? say(!undef) : say(!!undef); exit undef;

      It's not easy being a rookie.

      Having fun if you are,
      Jambo

        I guess what im replying to is just a figment of my imagination