in reply to Re: Monkey patching all subs with a basic 'starting subname' message
in thread Monkey patching all subs with a basic 'starting subname' message
Thanks, Rolf;
'Advice' and 'around' are indeed very good search keywords for examples of what I am doing, and point me right to people who I am sure have done it well -- thanks for this.
prototype is -- now that I have seen it -- obvious, really! Can't believe I missed that on my first scan through perlfunc! I have managed to fold the output of this into my code using eval; of course, now the meat of my redefined sub is essentially a string -- is this the sanest way to apply this?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Monkey patching all subs with a basic 'starting subname' message
by LanX (Saint) on Jul 14, 2017 at 20:00 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 17, 2017 at 20:11 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jul 17, 2017 at 20:18 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 18, 2017 at 12:04 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jul 18, 2017 at 13:44 UTC | |
| |
by Corion (Patriarch) on Jul 25, 2017 at 12:05 UTC |