Re^3: Monkey patching all subs with a basic 'starting subname' message

I don't always have the luxury at $work

This is never the case for code or technical reasons. It is sometimes the case for licensing and legal reasons. If so, you should go right to you manager and say, “Look, this is a 10 month project and it’s going to be of pretty low to mediocre quality in the end and not cover some parts because I couldn’t figure out how to stop the segfaults. Or we could do this for free in a half hour today–” I’m not being an a$$ or snarky remarking about the quality. If you could do it better than, or even half as well as, the solution recommended by afoken, you wouldn’t have to ask questions here. You would already know more than the rest of us about it.

As a learning exercise, it’s terrific though.

Comment on Re^3: Monkey patching all subs with a basic 'starting subname' message Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Monkey patching all subs with a basic 'starting subname' message by Anonymous Monk on Jul 17, 2017 at 20:38 UTC
It's OK, it didn't live long enough to worry about. It certainly wasn't a blocker for a 10-month cycle, I just needed it short-term, to trace the flow through some code I hadn't seen before. 99% of my needs were covered by the code I wrote, the rest was determined pretty quickly after that, the original source was reverted shortly thereafter and the debug code I wrote was stricken from the record! ...and then I wondered!<.p>	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Monkey patching all subs with a basic 'starting subname' message
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 17, 2017 at 20:38 UTC

It's OK, it didn't live long enough to worry about. It certainly wasn't a blocker for a 10-month cycle, I just needed it short-term, to trace the flow through some code I hadn't seen before.

99% of my needs were covered by the code I wrote, the rest was determined pretty quickly after that, the original source was reverted shortly thereafter and the debug code I wrote was stricken from the record!

...and then I wondered!<.p>

[reply]