in reply to Re^5: Which internal DSL are there in Perl? (Domain Specific Languages - Part 1)
in thread Which internal DSL are there in Perl? (Domain Specific Languages - Part 1)

and it has a lot of redundant code, mainly the objects and arrows on the LHS.

That'snotredundant.Spacersarecrucialandcan'tbeomitted.

Both your CGI::HTML::Functions and Rex examples have more parent-language symbols that the two examples I gave

My main problem is that I don't consider XPath to be a particularly good readable.

wut. It's literally the same as a directory path, with the addition of subqueries ([...]) and simple comparison (...=...). I don't know of a simpler, more readable language.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Which internal DSL are there in Perl? (Domain Specific Languages - Part 1)
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 07, 2017 at 00:37 UTC
    > I don't know of a simpler, more readable language.

    let's discuss it after YAPC ... :)

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!