in reply to Re: "Inline" module testing?
in thread "Inline" module testing?
> I don't understand what you want
Maybe the wording "module testing" was to sloppy
Real module testing requires a test suite, not a sub at the end of the file.
I meant rather "module demonstration" or "proof of concept" testing, where module.pm and user.pl are packed into the same file, like when posting an example on perlmonks.
Thank you for the interesting code, but it's significantly un-easier for my case, might help me in other occasions though.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: "Inline" module testing?
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 15, 2017 at 01:49 UTC |