in reply to Re^3: Generic/Variable/Dynamic Subroutines? (Not a redefine) (updated)
in thread Generic/Variable/Dynamic Subroutines? (Not a redefine)

If compiling Perl code is slow, only autoloading on demand is faster

Again, this used to be helpful 20 years ago. ... ;)

Well, it is still useful for... what was the buzzword again? ah. "Continuous Integration" 'tis named I guess, if you replace AutoLoader with AutoReloader (PerlMonks thread).
(yes, shameless plug :)

perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'
  • Comment on Re^4: Generic/Variable/Dynamic Subroutines? (AutoReloader)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Generic/Variable/Dynamic Subroutines? (Not a redefine) (updated)
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 21, 2017 at 18:19 UTC
    I don't doubt there are still useful cases, I'm using AUTOLOAD a lot.

    But autosplit was particularly useful when RAM, disk access and processor speed were bigger issues.

    I'm reluctant to explain a newbie how to use a rocket instead of the bus.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

      I'm reluctant to explain a newbie how to use a rocket instead of the bus.

      The OP, from their OP, doesn't look like a newbie in perl, at all. Exploring all of perl takes a long time...

      perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'
        Googling and cut&paste is cheap, smells like a XY Problem for me.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
        Je suis Charlie!

        Update: I was referring to

        > > am relatively new to perl