Re^2: Keeping relationally child objects alive with Moo

Nope, as I said, I want to get the basic approach right as the priority, only if the issue were unavoidable from the outset for lack of a better approach would it be sound to pursue it by keeping the basics and looking at the code in detail.

One world, one people

Comment on Re^2: Keeping relationally child objects alive with Moo

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Keeping relationally child objects alive with Moo by Anonymous Monk on Sep 21, 2017 at 12:22 UTC
you claimed that objects were getting destroyed even though you still have a reference to them, that should not happen, and if it is, then you've either found a serious bug in Perl or a serious bug in your code. so that needs to be tracked down and fixed before discussing the "basic approach", since obviously there is something wrong with it right now. SSCCE	[reply]