in reply to Shouldn't enc2xs always be included as part of Encode?

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Shouldn't enc2xs always be included as part of Encode?
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Oct 06, 2017 at 18:47 UTC

    Given the amiable, breezy nature of the commentary it might seem odd that it's downvoted, even malicious or personal. It has been said so and I expect will again.

    To put that to rest: when this answer is read for comprehension and stripped of everything irrelevant to the original question—all the semantic fugu deflated—it reads–

    You never can tell and mistakes happen. I solved this with Perl. Sometimes system tools.

      With a little elbow grease you could make that into a haiku. Or something from horse_ebooks (rip)

      Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you're god damn right I'm living in the fucking past

      You never can tell and mistakes happen. I solved this with Perl. Sometimes system tools.

      it actually means i paid for a solution (It is spampoop)