in reply to Re: Is there a way to allow consecutive zero-length matches without using pos()?
in thread Is there a way to allow consecutive zero-length matches without using pos()?

OK, I'm putting together a test case now. It's turning out more complicated than I thought, but I'll post it here when I get it working.

I profiled this with NYTProf and it is indeed the pos()= pos() statement that is taking all the extra time. However, the exact conditions that trigger it are currently eluding me; I'll continue to isolate it.

  • Comment on Re^2: Is there a way to allow consecutive zero-length matches without using pos()?
  • Download Code