Re^2: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"?

There is always something to add. For example, what (versions) did I try? Might help someone with bisecting. In any case, good nodes are edited and well-formed. Would you write an essay that has text in the title, n/t in the body? ^#1

#1 But apparently, some people write footnotes that are longer than the article. And if I recall correctly, there was a full volume (a book) that served as a single footnote... So YMMV?

Comment on Re^2: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Nov 22, 2017 at 20:51 UTC
The question really is, would you write an essay to ask the temperature? It is a simple, self-contained question that enriches the monastery by being asked and answered and comparing it to anything more complex or problematic is fallacious. It's surreal to me that anyone, let alone a few anyones, has an issue with the brevity of the post from a known good monk or that one would insist on verbosity as a social benefit as opposed to RFC:Repetitive Verbosity Considered Harmful.	[reply]
Re^4: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 22, 2017 at 21:05 UTC
"verbosity" ne "context" Hurry up and approve the question.	[reply]