in reply to Re^4: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits
in thread Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"?

> I would marked the post for reaping and I do it.

Actually you didn't. :)

> question in the title and almost no content. OP msged

No mention of "reap:"

I'm always confused by considerations consisting of a why but without any what ?

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

  • Comment on Re^5: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom