in reply to *.pm vs. *::Simple
CGI.pm is a big module. It does a lot. It is part of the standard distro. It is well tested. It is well documented. It will do more than you want. Does this make it
Perhaps technically yes but in that case all modules/libraries are bloated. Does it only load the code that you use via a custom implementation of self loader - more or less yes. Will you see any practical speed benefit using anything else - probably not.
CGI.pm don't leave home without it.
cheers
PS some of the other offerings on CPAN are good. Some are not. Last time I bothered to mention this to one of the authors of a rather bad module I did not get a reply. In contrast Lincoln Stein, who mostly wrote CGI.pm, will likely reply within hours if you have a CGI.pm problem. Admittedly he is likely to explain that the module is fine and it is your code that sucks but that is because CGI.pm is so well tested ;-)
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: *.pm vs. *::Simple
by tstock (Curate) on Oct 22, 2001 at 23:25 UTC |