in reply to Re: Simple indentation. Does it need improvement?
in thread Simple indentation. Does it need improvement?

When I was reading the OP, the first thought I had was "POD". Why not to use the same names here? Indent::over, Indent::back, and maybe even more if needed?

($q=q:Sq=~/;[c](.)(.)/;chr(-||-|5+lengthSq)`"S|oS2"`map{chr |+ord }map{substrSq`S_+|`|}3E|-|`7**2-3:)=~y+S|`+$1,++print+eval$q,q,a,