in reply to Re: RTFM!!!!! (but if you didn't, no biggie)
in thread RTFM!!!!! (but if you didn't, no biggie)

Like I said, I'm not interested in rehashing the particulars of that debate. Old news.

$PM = "Perl Monk's";
$MCF = "Most Clueless Friar Abbot Bishop Pontiff Deacon Curate Priest";
$nysus = $PM . ' ' . $MCF;
Click here if you love Perl Monks

  • Comment on Re^2: RTFM!!!!! (but if you didn't, no biggie)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RTFM!!!!! (but if you didn't, no biggie)
by 1nickt (Canon) on Dec 15, 2017 at 13:59 UTC

    That was no debate. That was you being confronted on your approach to learning, which you've shown repeatedly is essentially "give me the answers without me doing the necessary work." If you didn't want to be taken to task again about that approach, posting a meditation defending it in these halls of learning was probably not the way to go.


    The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

      That is your opinion and I think you've reached the wrong conclusion. Again, not getting into it.

      $PM = "Perl Monk's";
      $MCF = "Most Clueless Friar Abbot Bishop Pontiff Deacon Curate Priest";
      $nysus = $PM . ' ' . $MCF;
      Click here if you love Perl Monks