in reply to Re: RFC: Test::Contract - extensible object-oriented runtime check series (DbC)
in thread RFC: Test::Contract - extensible object-oriented runtime check series

Hello Arunbear,

I probably didn't at the time of the grandparent post, but I did look it up since and abandoned contract in the name for good.

I don't think what I want is full-fledged DbC though. It's a bit "take it or leave it" - adding it to just some subs looks silly and adding it throughout an (already working) project seems like a bit of overkill and also a big and risky task.

  • Comment on Re^2: RFC: Test::Contract - extensible object-oriented runtime check series (DbC)