That's ridiculous. Where is the cost to sundial of being berated by you or marto with near-identical diatribes each time he spews out some meaningless and largely irrelevant drivel? It sure isn't working, if raising the cost is intended to shut him up. Instead the cost is borne by everyone else who now has to read or ignore double the drivel or triple the tripe.
Honestly, how can you think "Don't feed the trolls" does not apply here?
Why don't you expend some of the same energy and examine (a) what percentage of posts are sundialharrea and (b) what percentage of posts are responses telling him he has the runs? Then look at the report and consider whether *you* are adding anything with those responses.
The way forward always starts with a minimal test.
| [reply] |
The point of not feeding trolls is they reply again and it's a stupid circle downwards. Déjà vu… The monk in question nearly never replies to critiques, especially mine so there is no flame/troll war unless others jump in.
Also, this is not trolling. Trolling is intentional inflammatory behavior. This is professional vampirism and, I image, some kind of emotional issues but I don't care anymore. Maybe you like being sucked dry here, I don't. "Troll" is about as meaningful as "racist" today because of constant repurposing to one's own erroneous usage.
If you can tolerate his responses, you can tolerate mine. After all, as one of the AnonymousCowards here has pointed out a couple of times, I'm the obvious troll. So stop "feeding me" if you believe your own PR.
| [reply] |
you think "defending the integrity of the monastery" and troll feeding are mutually exclusive? they are one and the same, did you sleep through trolling 101? | [reply] |
you can call it defending, I call it troll feeding
sundial, marto, me, you, all of it is just noise
any regular should know sundial wont be shut up
tell me again how martos post did any good? | [reply] |