in reply to Re^10: Reasons for Using Perl 6
in thread Reasons for Using Perl 6

Haha, I missed the fact that you knew 11 times would be a Num. Wow, don't you realize that your post refutes itself? Alright, peace out.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^12: Reasons for Using Perl 6
by Laurent_R (Canon) on Jan 03, 2018 at 23:32 UTC
    I am not desperately trying to prove something, right or wrong, I am just trying honestly report my findings. I am genuinely sure you can understand this mindset.
      You are desperately trying to convince yourself that Perl6's behavior is "good", even though the evidence you have found yourself screams out that it is deeply flawed. Step back and look at what you are saying.
        A number of years ago, I decided that I wasn't going to argue more than once or at most twice with an Anonymous Monk on this site.

        I made an exception this time, because I wasn't really trying to argue for or against a specific opinion, nor trying to convince you at all costs, but simply trying explain frankly the advantages and shortcomings of the Rat type, as I see them. It appears that you are not playing by the same rules and just trying to use my honest words against me or my opinions. I don't think there is any point for me to discuss this further with you.