in reply to Recursively walk up a directory tree

Its called a module
  • Comment on Re: Recursively walk up a directory tree

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Recursively walk up a directory tree
by stevieb (Canon) on Feb 10, 2018 at 17:31 UTC

    I believe you actually meant "distribution" if I've understood what you meant correctly. Semantics, I know, but an important distinction.

      I believe you actually meant "distribution" if I've understood what you meant correctly. Semantics, I know, but an important distinction.

      Hehe,

      OP posts some code and asks Is there anything more elegant than this?

      Yeah, its called a module.

      Instead of doing ... 20 lines to modify global variable ... do use HideTwentyLines; and

      elegance achieved

        Hidden and elegant are not synonymous. The @INC manipulation was a solid clue, as 1nickt confirmed, that modules might be a poor suggestion; especially wrapped in snark empty of discussion, caveat, or example. There is little less elegant, proper, or convincing than–

        a title

        –as a punchline. Unless it's The Aristocrats! of course.

        A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

        Yeah, its called a module.

        Given that the purpose of finding the base directory is to be able to add the lib directory to @INC, how do you suggest such a module could be loaded?


        The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

        Ok, I did misunderstand. I thought you were referring to packaging the code into a distribution :)