amasidlover has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
As per accepted wisdom we've replaced XMLin with XML::LibXML - there are places where its made life easier and places where its made life harder but overall its been a positive change (its also quite a lot faster.)
However, we're now looking at XMLout - we currently do XMLout($some_big_hashref, options) and then put the output through XSL - and before anyone suggests JSON, Template::Toolkit etc. as alternatives; we do use those but in other parts of our system.
So I got a newly recruited developer to knock together a 'quick and dirty' test script to see a) how to do it and b) the performance impact. We started with an XML::Simple section as a benchmark:
package MyXMLSimple; use base 'XML::Simple'; sub sorted_keys { my ( $self, $name, $hashref ) = @_; return sort { ma +in::element_order($a) <=> main::element_order($b) } keys(%{$hashref}) +; }; ... SNIP ... return $parser->XMLout($xml, KeyAttr => [], RootName => 'Zymonic', NoEscape => 1, SuppressEmpty => 1 );
Then we did a LibXML version...
sub add_nodes_hash { #first time $xml will be the file, after that it will be the hash +or array ref # $is_child is a flag to see if it wants to be added as like a roo +t node, or part of a nest my $xml = shift; my $parent_element = shift; foreach my $node (sort {element_order($a) <=> element_order($b)} k +eys %{$xml}) { #next if ($node =~/\//); if (ref($xml->{$node}) eq 'HASH') { my $element = $dom->createElement( $node ); $parent_element->insertAfter($element,undef); add_nodes_hash($xml->{$node},$element); } if (ref( $xml->{$node} ) eq 'ARRAY') { foreach my $array_element (@{$xml->{$node}}) { if (ref($array_element) eq 'HASH') { my $element = $dom->createElement( $node ); my @attributes = $element->attributes(); $parent_element->insertAfter($element,undef); add_nodes_hash($array_element,$element); } elsif (!ref( $xml->{$node} ) && ($xml->{$node})) { my $element = $dom->createElement( $node ); $element->appendText($xml->{$node}); $parent_element->insertAfter($element,undef); } } } elsif (!ref( $xml->{$node} ) && ($xml->{$node})) { my $element = $dom->createElement( $node ); $element->appendText($xml->{$node}); $parent_element->insertAfter($element,undef); } } return $dom; } sub libxml_output { my $xml = shift; #create the dom object $dom = XML::LibXML::Document->new(); my $root = $dom->createElement('Zymonic'); $dom->setDocumentElement($root); add_nodes_hash($xml, $root); return $dom->toString(1); }
When we generate 3000 lines of XML (approximately) we get the following timings.
====================TIMINGS======================= LibXML time for 100 rep(s): 5409.750 ms XML Simple time for 100 rep(s): 3699.437 ms
I'll put the full test script code in a reply to this node in case it helps - but didn't want to add it all for brevity
Now before I ask my specific questions, I'll add some caveats / further info:
Finally, my actual question(s)... Have we made a fundamental error somewhere and there is a way of going from XMLout to something 'better' whilst retaining equivalent (or better!) performance and keeping the code nice and simple? Ideally a method that we can use a one liner to go from nested hashref to XML output.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Replacing XML::Simple XMLout with Lib::XML
by salva (Canon) on Feb 15, 2018 at 12:30 UTC | |
by amasidlover (Sexton) on Feb 15, 2018 at 13:00 UTC | |
|
Re: Replacing XML::Simple XMLout with Lib::XML
by shmem (Chancellor) on Feb 15, 2018 at 13:58 UTC | |
by amasidlover (Sexton) on Feb 15, 2018 at 14:56 UTC | |
|
Re: Replacing XML::Simple XMLout with Lib::XML
by amasidlover (Sexton) on Feb 15, 2018 at 11:50 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 15, 2018 at 13:25 UTC | |
by amasidlover (Sexton) on Feb 15, 2018 at 13:39 UTC |