Re^2: Does ISO8601 require a separator in the time if one is used in the date?

Thanks Eily. I had seen that, but frankly I'd rank DateTime modules above Wikipedia as an authority. I'm hoping someone can point to the spec, although I've looked at that in various places as well.

The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

Comment on Re^2: Does ISO8601 require a separator in the time if one is used in the date?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Does ISO8601 require a separator in the time if one is used in the date? by Eily (Monsignor) on Mar 01, 2018 at 17:56 UTC
I'd rank DateTime modules above Wikipedia as an authority Well in this case they agree anyway :) . But I guess nothing beats a direct citation from the spec.	[reply]
Re^3: Does ISO8601 require a separator in the time if one is used in the date? by stevieb (Canon) on Mar 01, 2018 at 16:58 UTC
I can't even find a single RFC that refers to this forced condition. Now I've started, I'm curious to find something myself here if possible...	[reply]
Re^4: Does ISO8601 require a separator in the time if one is used in the date? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 01, 2018 at 18:34 UTC
Why would you be looking at RFC for an ISO standard? The web standard that most closely resembles ISO-8601 is RFC3339, and it's far, far less flexible. It always required the "`:`" (among other things).	[reply] [d/l]