Re^4: Unexplained benchmark when using chop vs. chomp (or neither)

Bareword found where operator expected at -e line 1, near "// svc"
    (Missing operator before svc?)
syntax error at -e line 1, near "// svc
"
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
[download]

($q=q:Sq=~/;[c](.)(.)/;chr(-||-|5+lengthSq)`"S|oS2"`map{chr |+ord
}map{substrSq`S_+|`|}3E|-|`7**2-3:)=~y+S|`+$1,++print+eval$q,q,a,
[download]

Comment on Re^4: Unexplained benchmark when using chop vs. chomp (or neither) Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Unexplained benchmark when using chop vs. chomp (or neither) by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Mar 08, 2018 at 13:04 UTC
Yes. This i meant. Good observed. Best regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť `perl -MCrypt::CBC -E 'say Crypt::CBC->new(-key=>'kgb',-cipher=>"Blowfish")->decrypt_hex($ENV{KARL});'`Help	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Unexplained benchmark when using chop vs. chomp (or neither) by stevieb (Canon) on Mar 08, 2018 at 22:50 UTC
...and some say Perl is based on C. Meh ;)	[reply]
Re^6: Unexplained benchmark when using chop vs. chomp (or neither) by Eily (Monsignor) on Mar 09, 2018 at 11:13 UTC
Well, that's a C++ style comment. Not that a C-style one works either: `print "Hello World!\n"; /* Don't know how that works, found it on the internet /` `Quantifier follows nothing in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/ <-- HERE Don't know how that works, found it on the internet */ at -e line 1.`	[reply] [d/l] [select]