Re^2: say variable in Class

Hello Ron,

thank you for your reply. I think what you mean is that $.x would be accessible in the class as part of a method but not directly. Therefore your first method will work of course but defeats a bit the idea that the object on creation reports its status. The second approach works exactly as it should. And I guess now I need to learn why. So you were absolutely right about the intention :).

Now I know what to learn, that is real progress!

Thx a lot!

Comment on Re^2: say variable in Class

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: say variable in Class by Laurent_R (Canon) on Jun 03, 2018 at 16:32 UTC
but defeats a bit the idea that the object on creation reports its status If you want to do that, then you would probably need to create your own constructor with this added feature in it. Or, as shown by mr_ron, you might (re)define the `TWEAK` submethod, which is called by the `new` default constructor, so that redefining `TWEAK` effectively modifies the behavior of `new`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]