in reply to Re^2: Tkx after coderef problem
in thread Tkx after coderef problem
"no it doesnt create an anonymous sub it doesnt need to
If you are so sure of that then prove it, show me a link to the arrayref processing of Tkx:after calls, or tell me where to look for the code. Till then my thought that processing of a arrayref in the callback position creates a single use anon-coderef still holds as it explains why that call method works, like the the sub{...} method does, but the static coderef fails. (well at least on unix).
There is deep autoload magic going on in Tkx that i still dont understand and i have yet to find out where the parameter munging actually takes place to move across the perl<->Tk/Tcl boundary. Ive even tried to look for it.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Tkx after coderef problem
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 03, 2018 at 09:59 UTC |